{"id":1170,"date":"2015-09-25T15:06:09","date_gmt":"2015-09-25T15:06:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/?p=1170"},"modified":"2015-09-25T15:06:09","modified_gmt":"2015-09-25T15:06:09","slug":"should-citations-reference-image-manipulation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/?p=1170","title":{"rendered":"Should Citations Reference Image Manipulation?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-1171 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/connie-ufkes1963-300x229.jpg\" alt=\"connie-ufkes1963\" width=\"300\" height=\"229\" srcset=\"https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/connie-ufkes1963-300x229.jpg 300w, https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/09\/connie-ufkes1963.jpg 327w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/>The citation in the bottom of the image accompanying this post really isn&#8217;t in proper\u00a0<em><a href=\"http:\/\/amzn.to\/1H8sTPT\">Evidence Explained<\/a><\/em>\u00a0format. It has the key elements, although I did fail to include the fact that it was a digital image that was originally accessed. Some may say that&#8217;s &#8220;common sense&#8221; from where the item was obtained, but that&#8217;s a topic for another post.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s &#8220;image cropped from original&#8221; that I want to address.<\/p>\n<p>I modified this image.<\/p>\n<p>I didn&#8217;t correct the spelling of any names and I didn&#8217;t remove any names from the listing. What I did do however was to remove the other pictures from the row in which Mom&#8217;s picture appeared. The intent here was not to deceive or &#8220;leave out something crucial.&#8221; I simply wanted to have a smaller image.<\/p>\n<p>I think that my citation should note that I&#8217;ve altered the image because I have. It&#8217;s not like the original. It is two separate parts of the original placed together. What I did with this image was not the same as simply taking a part of it and reproducing that portion of the image as a smaller image. Genealogists do that on a regular basis, particularly with records that include information on several families, many of whom are unrelated. Other genealogists &#8220;rearrange&#8221; items from newspapers when articles are spread over several columns or several pages. That doesn&#8217;t really alter the content either&#8211;usually.<\/p>\n<p>And \u00a0it&#8217;s not the same as using various lightening and darkening features to enhance an image. Genealogists do that as well. That&#8217;s not really altering what is on the image either and could be considered like taking another picture with better lighting.<\/p>\n<p>Removing the others from the year book image of my mother doesn&#8217;t change what this image communicates. The people are shown alphabetically, it&#8217;s not as if they are in family groups and I&#8217;ve not altered any impression of family structure by removing the others. But I&#8217;m starting to think that whenever I perform any editing of this type on a digital image, I should mention that editing in my citation.<\/p>\n<p>So that others know that what they are seeing is not the original.<\/p>\n<p>And now that I think about it, using &#8220;image cropped from original&#8221; really isn&#8217;t accurate here either so I need to improve upon that phrase.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The citation in the bottom of the image accompanying this post really isn&#8217;t in proper\u00a0Evidence Explained\u00a0format. It has the key elements, although I did fail to include the fact that it was a digital image that was originally accessed. Some may say that&#8217;s &#8220;common sense&#8221; from where the item was obtained, but that&#8217;s a topic [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[138],"class_list":["post-1170","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-image-citation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1170"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1170\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1170"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rootdig.genealogytipoftheday.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}