How much it will help my writing is yet to be determined and I probably should not admit to it publicly, but I finally took the plunge and purchased The Chicago Manual of Style, 16th Edition. I have a reasonably firm grasp of the English language and grammar, but a printed reference will be nice to have.
I don’t think the typical genealogist needs to have it. I also don’t think a genealogist’s analysis of a problem is invalid if a few comma splices have been sprinkled in their argument. If their argument falls due to a few grammar errors, then it was not that strong of an argument in the first place. I’ve probably spliced a few commas myself upon occasion. But there are times when I do want to know the “correct” way to do something and TCMoS is one place to find out. And my personal preference is to have a printed book over an electronic resource.
This doesn’t replace Evidence Explained–not by a long shot. Evidence Explained has templates for the citation of genealogical references not covered in TCMoS. Evidence Explained also has a nice discussion of the research process and evidence analysis and, in the discussion of specific citations, provides a broad background on the specific item being discussed.
So watch out comma splices, I’m getting prepared!
2 Responses
Chicago is not designed for genealogists, as is Evidence Explained. It’s used more by historians.
BTW, the University of Chicago Press announced earlier this week that the 17th edition of this title will be released in September. See http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo25956703.html .
I know. Just never hurts to have another perspective 😉